|

Current situation
Give me more
details
Who are the
detainees?
Who are we?

Pose for Human Rights… and relay our Human message
towards Thai authorities
Sign the petitions
Write to the detainees
Send them some sun
Become a Mobilizer!
èHere
is your Toolbox

News from inside
Key dates & birthdays
News from outside

Mobilized countries
Recent pictures
Your Messages for
Thai
Authorities
CONTACTS
|
TO
MAKE IT SIMPLE…
The
steps of the resettlement process these detainees are going through are:
- they left their country where they felt their life was
endangered
- they reached Bangkok UNHCR’s office to ask political asylum
- their situation has to be studied by UNHCR to know if they
have to be recognized as refugees.
The normal process takes several months, the applicants have to
constitute a file, to explain why they left their country and to bring
evidence of the threats they were facing before their departure.
One or several interviews will be made by UNHCR officers, to
determine if the applicants are telling the truth and must be given the
refugee’s status.
During all this process, the applicants will be called “asylum
seekers”.
- the people whose situation, according to UNHCR’s assessment,
can not go back to their country, will be given the status of refugees.
- the next step UNHCR has to undertake is to ask some third
countries to resettle these refugees, as they can not settle in Thailand,
where they have no legal status (Thailand did not sign the Geneva
Convention relating to refugees’ rights).
Resettlement means that a country accepts to welcome a family
or individual and to offer them a place to live, while helping them to
integrate in this new country, as the life in their country of origin is
not possible anymore, at least at present time.
The decision process to accept a refugee’s resettlement usually
takes from 6 to 12 months depending on the country, except if these is an
emergency for resettlement (as it is the case when there is undue
detention).
In that case, UNHCR can ask to an embassy an “urgent priority
resettlement”; in that accelerated process, the Embassy has 2 months to
study the case and give an answer to the resettlement request
- if the
resettlement has been accepted, the refugee will be taken in charge by the
International Office of Migrations for organization of his departure
- if the request is rejected for any reason, the refugee will
be proposed for resettlement to a different country.
LONG WAY TO
GO, ISN’T IT…?
|
|
Give Me More Details…
|
I CELEBRATED MY THIRD BIRTHDAY IN JAIL
|
My name is Nanthini,
I am 3 years old,
I am a Tamil from Sri Lanka,
I have lived with my
mother and my elder brother Raja,
in jail in Bangkok for 3
months,
My father is also
here, but I never see him,
My mother tells me
he stays in another cell.
|

|
|
|
To live in
a war affected country is never a choice, but has lifelong
consequences.
Children
pay a heavy tribute in the internal or international conflicts that shake
the world.
What
kind of adult can you become when you have already lived in jail at 3 years
of age?
|
|
Nanthini’s story is both
extraordinary and common.
It is the story of a small
girl whose parents, because they were facing a life threatening situation
in their country, made the difficult choice to exile themselves and ask for
international protection from the United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees.
Nanthini’s family left Sri Lanka because of the renewed increase in
fighting and insecurity as did the other families who are now detained by
the Thai authorities in Bangkok.
Their village was attacked, several of Raja’s schoolmates died from
bombings. Other families went to camps packed with refugees where the
humanitarian aid that is essential for their survival very occasionally
manages to reach them.
Raja’s parents know exactly
what it means to live in a war affected country.
At present they are in their
thirties, the war exploded when they were young children, and has only
calmed down 20 years later.
Bombings,
death
of relatives,
displacement
in overcrowded camps,
disruption
of basic health and school services, shortage of food…
have
been their everyday lot for many years.
The resumption of hostilities
affecting Sri Lanka over
the last year and a half has left with no choice but to find another way to
secure a better childhood for their own children that is no longer possible
in Sri Lanka.
They exiled themselves at the
end of 2006 and arrived in Thailand.
|
|
They immediately asked the refugee status to UNHCR
office in Bangkok
and obtained it after a few months.
|
|
Unhappily the following is
quite common:
|
|
Raja remembers:
“We celebrated that day
First we went to the temple,
then, Mummy cooked a big rice and curry dish and made some sweets, and we
invited all the neighbors.
Nanthini and I didn’t really
understand what was going on, so Daddy explained to us that those who were
taking care of people like us had now decided that we were refugees, and
that very soon they would help us to go to a country where we would have
the right to walk in the street and to go back to school.
After hearing this, my little
sister and I, were also very happy that day”
|
|
One morning, Raja and
Nanthini woke up because of shouting and cries:
“Everybody was running
around, there were policemen everywhere.
We could not understand what
they were saying, but they were shouting very loud at Mummy because she
wanted to take a few clothes. They put us in a caged truck, and they
brought us here.
All the people in the street
were looking at us, so we hid our faces in Mummy’s skirt. We knew we had
done nothing wrong and were sure that it was a mistake that we were being
taken like that. We thought they would bring us back home later, and didn’t
want the people from this area to think that we were bad people.”
|
|
Raja and Nanthini and another 3 children were arrested in
March 2007 and imprisoned in IDC (Immigration Detention Centre), Bangkok.
|
In their
cell, they met Sana,
a 6 year old,
who was
arrested with her parents
in
January 2007 in similar conditions.
|
On the
2nd of July, another group of families
including
18 children were raided and imprisoned by the Thai immigration police.
|
|
|
|
Because Thailand
did not sign the
Geneva Convention relating
to refugees rights,
all these families and people
are considered as illegal immigrants and can be kept
for an undetermined duration
of detention or deported.
|
WHAT CAN WE DO…?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our mobilization first consisted in “mobilizing” UNHCR to
consider the situation of these detainees as an emergency. An online
petition, gathering signatures from people living in 35 countries, helped
us to enter in contact with UNHCR Geneva and to call them out about the
plight of these refugees and asylum seekers. Through this mobilization launched
in July 2007, we obtained from UNHCR that they request
urgent priority resettlement
to various third countries that could resettle the detainees
who were previously granted the refugee status.
ê
Since UNHCR asked to some third countries an urgent priority
resettlement, we have been informing the relevant embassies about the
inhuman detention conditions of these detainees, by relaying towards them
the letter “Voices of Detained Refugees” thanks to the countersignatures
gathered online or in the streets of various cities.
|
ê
At present time, no embassy or UNHCR staff is permitted by the
authorities of the Immigration Detention centre (IDC) to enter in contact
with the detainees. This situation has been blocked since April 2007,
despite all diplomatic negotiations.
Because of that,
the 41 asylum seekers have no hope to see their situation
evolve, as UNHCR can not recognize them as refugees without interviewing
them.
Because of that,
some refugees’ resettlement requests were recently rejected or
are pending since many months as it is difficult for Embassies to take a
resettlement decision without being able to enter in contact with the refugees.
ê
As a consequence, our current action is to send a human
message to Thai authorities to ask them to let UNHCR and Embassies access
the refugees and asylum seekers detained in IDC
|
|
êêê GOOD
NEWS êêê
Nanthini,
Raja AND Sana’s families recently left IDC
for Norway
AFTER THEIR RESETTLEMENT WAS ACCEPTED.
|
|
BUT there
is still a long way to go for most of the 92 people still imprisoned:
Among the
92 detainees,
è 83 fled from Sri Lanka, 9 from Nepal.
è 51 people have been recognized
by UNHCR as refugees
è 41 are still asylum seekers
è 8
families are included, with 20 children including 12 aged less than 10 and
9 aged less than 6
Among them,
|
|
13
|
Refugees received the news that one country had accepted to
resettle them and will hopefully soon leave the jail.
|
|
13
|
Refugees are hoping for a positive answer to their
resettlement request from one third country
|
|
17
|
Refugees have been rejected by one country and not yet been
proposed for resettlement to another country
|
|
08
|
Refugees have not yet been proposed to any country
|
|
41
|
Are asylum seekers, their status determination is blocked as
UNHCR has no access to the detention centre
|
|
That means that for these above 79 people (if we don’t consider
the 13 people already accepted by a third country), the fact that UNHCR and
Embassies have no access to IDC is a major problem and can cause them to
stay in jail months and years…
|
è
è
è
è
è
|
HELP THESE FAMILIES BY RELAYING OUR HUMAN MESSAGE TOWARDS THAI AUTHORITIES
|
|